deliveryfocus.net Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the deliveryfocus.net

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host deliveryfocus.net. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

simon munro software development and public cloud home about simon munro cv/resume contact consulting subscribe to feed windows on devices ecg august 3, 2014 in uncategorized | tags: iot , windowsondevices | leave a comment i received my free intel galileo running windows from the windows developer program for iot . initial setup and the first sample was easy enough, although it is a bit weird running a telnet session to a windows machine that runs on a device that feels a lot like an arduino! i have an arduino servo board that i wanted to try, but it seems that the servo.h libraries haven’t been ported yet. if anyone has existing servo code for windows on galileo, i’d like to see it. i abandoned the windows on robots idea for now and picked up a different shield. recently, i have been playing with a cooking hacks e-health sensor platform v2.0 . it is an arduino shield that allows a bunch of health sensors to be plugged in. i have the shield as well as the pulsixometer and ecg sensor, which i am able to work with on the arduino, and thought that i’d give it a try on the windows galileo board. to start, i downloaded the library for the e-health sensor platform for galileo – this is a library for a standard galileo, not a windows one, but would be a good place to start. i had a look at the source for the library and found that the pulsixometer doesn’t exist (which is not surprising as the implementation of the pulsixometer is poor – it reads led’s rather than getting integer values). the ecg api was simply a small calculation made on an analogue read. even as a .net developer who has managed to avoid c++, i was able to implement it quite easily. all that the e-sensor does is convert the ecg reading into a voltage from 0 to 5 volts to build the waveform. the simple code looks like this: void loop() { float analog0; analog0 = analogread(0); float ecg; ecg = ( float )analog0 * 5 / 1023.0; log(l "ecg: %lf\n" , ecg); delay(10); } with debugger output… here’s what the bits look like… next step is to send that data up to service bus, but it will take a bit longer. simon munro @simonmunro advertisements how much alm do you need for cloud applications? january 10, 2013 in calm , cloud , cloud computing | tags: alm | leave a comment alm (application lifecycle management) means different things to different people, and these views are largely influenced by tool vendors. ibm users may bias their view of alm to things that the rational toolset is good at — say requirements traceability and java-oriented modelling. microsoft users may see alm as being about using tfs (team foundation server) — with visual studio integrated sprints, tasks and testing tools. ruby developers may see alm as being about distributed source control and behaviour driven development — such as using git and cucumber. (i say may because some of these toolsets and frameworks are very broad — more broad than most of their users are aware). alm is everything that is supported by those tools and frameworks — and more. think, without referencing your favourite tools, about the lifecycle on an application. it starts off with an idea, hopefully gets developed and tested, is deployed to production, and supported and maintained for a few years until it is finally retired. over that period there are a lot of people, processes, deliverables, expenses, plans and other things that need to be organised, utilised, directed, controlled, disposed of — well, managed, really. in that context pretty much everything is alm. business have, over the years, generalised processes, made them more efficient, and developed specialised tools and skills. the application lifecycle that requires those processes would make use of the existing parts of the business. the obvious ones would be things like financial planning and control, human resources, risk and compliance, and project management. it may be contentious, especially with the public cloud, but established businesses have it processes too — from operations and support, to capacity planning, security, and (enterprise) architecture. this starts narrowing the scope of what is left to deal with in understanding the alm processes that are needed, as illustrated below: in addition, certain technology choices limit how you can manage the application lifecycle. i hesitated making this point, as determining the technology can be part of alm — but ultimately there will be things that are beyond control and processes that need to be included rather than adapted. if you are developing an app to be deployed on ios, for example, you have little choice but to manage the deployment of (part of) the app according to apple’s rules. there are also lower level constraints based on the environment and availability of development skills, at least for most projects. an application developed for windows azure in a .net team is going to coded in visual studio, c#, and use the .net azure sdk — there is not much that you can do about it apart from completely changing the technology choices, which is not always practical. these technology constraints on being able to define alm processes is illustrated in the diagram below: when it comes to understanding the need for alm on the cloud there are two different scenarios — one for established enterprises and one for startups. with enterprises, there may be a lot of processes and technologies that support application management, but they may be totally irrelevant in the cloud. for example, the existing capex-oriented financial modelling is useless when looking at a pay-per-use pricing model. years of effort and experience on specific technologies, such as running oracle databases in an on-premise datacentre, is less applicable for cloud applications. the diagram below depicts the reduced overlap between existing process and technology choices and cloud specific alm processes: at the other end of the scale are new business ventures that have few existing business processes and little in the way of fixed technology choices. this means that there is a lot of work to do in terms of defining the cloud specific alm processes. in a lot of software-oriented startups the distinction between business processes and software processes barely exists because everybody is defining, building, supporting and selling the software itself — the software is the business. if it is a cloud-based software startup, virtually everything is about cloud alm (and it is fine not to call it that). this lack of existing processes is depicted in the diagram below where the overlap of processes and tools are smaller simply because none exist yet: the reason for failure (or muted success) of cloud applications has been, and will continue to be for the next few years, a lack of skills in designing, building and operating cloud applications. when looking at the problem in more detail, it is not that people are unskilled in general, they just don’t know how to adapt their skills to a new environment. when we looked at this problem last year, we felt that developing cloud specific skills is not about telling people “this is how you develop cloud applications” , but rather “you know how to develop applications, and this is what you need to do differently on the cloud” . the basis for this method of explaining is to assume application development skills and assume that the business already has some alm processes (whether formal or not) and hooking into those skills and processes. the result was a book that i wrote and published – “calm – cloud application lifecycle management”, which looks at what is different in the cloud from the context of various models. some of these models deal with upfront processes, such as defining the usage lifecycles (lifecycle model). some deal with overall processes, such as the cost model. most deal with fundamental design decisions, such as the availability and data models. there are also models that are important to longer-term success of the application

URL analysis for deliveryfocus.net

https://simonmunro.com/category/cloud/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/motorbikes/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/small-and-medium-business/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/scale-out/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/definition/
https://simonmunro.com/2010/10/13/rumb-line-function-for-sql-server/#respond
https://simonmunro.com/tag/high-availability/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/tools/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/alm/
https://simonmunro.com/category/tools/
https://simonmunro.com/category/calm/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/computing-models/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/architecture/
https://simonmunro.com/tag/rumb-line/
https://simonmunro.com/2014/08/03/windows-on-devices-ecg/#respond
homebase.co.uk
movable-type.co.uk
bosch-pt.co.uk
maps.google.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: DELIVERYFOCUS.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1376347241_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2018-01-03T13:16:18Z
Creation Date: 2008-01-10T20:07:49Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-01-10T20:07:49Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS.123-REG.CO.UK
Name Server: NS2.123-REG.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-03-09T00:13:10Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =deliveryfocus.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME deliveryfocus.net

  CHANGED 2018-01-03

  CREATED 2008-01-10

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .